Hi there, On Sat, May 26, 2012 at 8:34 PM, Osamu Aoki <os...@debian.org> wrote: > Hi, > > On Sat, May 26, 2012 at 06:31:46PM +0200, Mike Gabriel wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> On Sa 26 Mai 2012 17:11:02 CEST Osamu Aoki wrote: >> >> >This ITP Bug #612341 was supposed to be closed by Fathi sometime early >> >January. Nothing happened. http://bugs.debian.org/612341 >> > >> >In the meantime, Ubuntu package was updated to generate -dev etc. >> > https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libjpeg-turbo >> > >> >libjpeg-turbo (1.1.90+svn733-0ubuntu4) precise; urgency=low >> > >> > * Install jpegint.h in the -dev package. >> > * Install jconfig.h in the multiarch include directory. >> > -- Matthias Klose <email address hidden> Fri, 13 Jan 2012 12:02:38 +0100 >> > >> >This package can be build on sid (under pbuilder) nicely practically as >> >is and also makes libjpeg-turbo8. So ABI of version 8 is taken care as >> >I understand. >> > >> >Also, Mike Gabriel's work seems to have done somethings interesting on >> >old Fathi's version and made many improvements. >> >> thanks for pinging us! I agree, libjpeg-turbo has to be in Wheezy!!! >> >> Fathi, please send us a notice what you plan on this package. > > I see Fathi being quite active. > > I have made packages for libjpeg-turbo 1.2.0. It builds OK. (Not much > useful to replace current libjpeg due to conflicts caused with many > packages. But who cares if it is used in the chroot to build virtualgl > :-) But I am not really up to maintaining this complicated package. > > My build result and git record are here as tar: > http://people.debian.org/~osamu/libjpeg-turbo-1.2.0-osamu.tar.gz > > Since -dev package is the only ones desparatedly needed, ... This is the > most important thing to get now. > > Maybe in post-wheezy, people can discuss transition from libjpeg to > libjpeg-turbo. This package is very tricky since it tries to replace > libjpeg. > > Regards, > > Osamu > > CCed: Bill who is libjpeg maintainer.
As far as I know libjpeg is not really concerned here. virtualgl only links to libturbojpeg. So there really are two issues in a single report: 1. optimized jpeg lib, as a replacement for libjpeg8 2. getting bumblebeed/virtualgl/turbojpeg(only) in debian Maybe it would be easier to only focus on (2) ? 2cts -M -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CA+7wUswSaW6AG_sFBKiJYs96-=fuigov5gsu0q-pp7tts6r...@mail.gmail.com