Your message dated 29 Apr 2002 20:28:35 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#144997: [ITP]: subversion -- an improved CVS
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 29 Apr 2002 14:28:25 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Apr 29 09:28:25 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from sub20-152.member.dsl-only.net (mail.fire-swamp.org)
[63.105.20.152]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 172C8f-0006Zn-00; Mon, 29 Apr 2002 09:28:25 -0500
Received: from srz by mail.fire-swamp.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]
id 172CAQ-0005N7-00; Mon, 29 Apr 2002 07:30:14 -0700
From: Stephen Zander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [ITP]: subversion -- an improved CVS
X-Debbugs-CC: Stephen Zander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Stephen Zander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2002 07:30:14 -0700
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name : subversion
Version :
Upstream Author : CollabNet
* URL : http://subversion.tigris.org/
* License : Apache/BSD
Description : an improved CVS
To my amazement, I find no mention of subversion either in the wnpp
or the archive, so I thouth I'd fix that.
Of course, BenC will now bounce on my head about why that's a
tremendously bad idea, or how he's already planning to package
subversion or something, but that's OK :)
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 144997-close) by bugs.debian.org; 30 Apr 2002 06:19:31 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Apr 30 01:19:31 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from murphy.debian.org [65.125.64.134]
by master.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 172Qz5-0007QQ-00; Tue, 30 Apr 2002 01:19:31 -0500
Received: (qmail 11368 invoked from network); 30 Apr 2002 03:36:11 -0000
Received: from dhcp64-134-66-136.four.sjc.wayport.net (HELO
mail.fire-swamp.org) (64.134.66.136)
by murphy.debian.org with SMTP; 30 Apr 2002 03:36:11 -0000
Received: from srz by mail.fire-swamp.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 172OJf-0000XW-00; Mon, 29 Apr 2002 20:28:35 -0700
To: David Kimdon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Stephen Zander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Bug#144997: [ITP]: subversion -- an improved CVS
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: Stephen Zander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 29 Apr 2002 20:28:35 -0700
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Lines: 13
User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) XEmacs/21.4 (Common Lisp)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Sender: Stephen Zander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>> "David" == David Kimdon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
David> I have packages built. They are waiting (and have been
David> waiting for quite a while) on uploads of db3.3 (now db4.0
David> which recently happenned) and apache2 (hasn't happenned
David> AFAIK). But you can test them (see link below).
Ah cool. Seems my search of the wnpp was not what it could be. :)
I'll wait for the dependencies to be filled.
--
Stephen
"And what do we burn apart from witches?"... "More witches!"
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
