Your message dated Thu, 25 Apr 2002 14:14:24 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line foo
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 5 Dec 2001 10:02:30 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Dec 05 04:02:30 2001
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from sunfish.linuxis.net [64.71.162.66]
by master.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 16BYso-0003yP-00; Wed, 05 Dec 2001 04:02:30 -0600
Received: (qmail 21640 invoked by uid 1000); 5 Dec 2001 09:58:00 -0000
Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2001 01:58:00 -0800
From: Adam McKenna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: ITP: mta-dummy
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mail-Followup-To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.21i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
I'd like to discuss the creation of an mta-dummy package.
This package would have no files (except perhaps a small doc), and provide
mail-transport-agent.
The purpose of this package would be for people who install their own MTA
from source. It is a royal pain in the ass installing an MTA from source in
Debian, because lots of packages depend on mail-transport-agent. This pretty
much forces the user to keep a package that provides mail-transport-agent
installed at all times. Keeping another MTA installed on the system just to
make the package management system happy is a waste of space and resources,
and could cause other problems, such as security holes (if the user keeps the
package on hold, preventing security updates from being installed),
interference with the locally-installed MTA, etc..
I made an mta-dummy package a couple years ago using the equivs package, and
it has saved me many headaches, and I've given it to others who were having
the same problem.
If anyone can think of a serious reason that this shouldn't be in the archive
(i.e., other than that you think it's silly, or the standard Packages file
bloat argument), please speak up, otherwise I'll upload this in a week or so.
--Adam
--
Adam McKenna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 122507-done) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Apr 2002 21:20:19 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Apr 25 16:20:19 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from moria.linuxis.net [64.71.162.80]
by master.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 170qf5-0007EU-00; Thu, 25 Apr 2002 16:20:19 -0500
Received: (qmail 22895 invoked by uid 1000); 25 Apr 2002 21:14:25 -0000
Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2002 14:14:24 -0700
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: foo
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
From: Adam McKenna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Delivery-Agent: TMDA/0.51 (Python 2.1.2 on Linux/i686)
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Adam McKenna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | GPG: 17A4 11F7 5E7E C2E7 08AA
http://flounder.net/publickey.html | 38B0 05D0 8BF7 2C6D 110A
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
