Hi Dominique, On 25 April 2012 07:15, Dominique Dumont <d...@debian.org> wrote: > From the titile of the bug, I assume you want to maintain this package.
Well, all I've done is produce a package. I think it complies with policy and all the new-fangled stuff like multi-arch, and it is source and binary lintian clean. Upstream considers that the project is complete, so I think the maintenance burden should be very low. I get the impression that it only supports OSS right now (unfortunately), so if I find myself with some free time, I might try and hack a PulseAudio back-end for it (but I'm not sure how free for that sort of hacking I'll be over the next few months). In any case, I don't mind looking after the package. > May I suggest you join sdl team to do so ? That sounds like a good idea. > This way, you'll be able to use our team's repo (git) and sponsoring will be > much easier. Yes; I'll have to look into how the git repo is structured. Should I update the control file to point to some future X-Vcs for this package, once I have had a look, then? And should the Maintainer field point at the team? My main concern in joining the team is one of commitment: I don't want to sign myself up for giving time to help out with all sorts of SDL issues, not because I'm not keen to help, but because I think it would be dishonest to make such a commitment when I'm not sure I have the free time to do so. Of course, team maintenance does seem to reduce the work burden for all concerned, so in that sense, I would be keen to join. Many thanks for your reply, -- Toby Smithe http://launchpad.net/~tsmithe -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CAHhkY_jCu9J8Y3S_JNcQ+qF4RnHkEZozAU4v-icT=zchu-y...@mail.gmail.com
