Hi Saumuel, On Mon, 2012-04-09 at 20:06 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> There is already a libotf in debian, for handling OpenType Font. What > I intend to do is renaming the so to allow co-installation, but > keep development file names as is and use a conflict between -dev > packages. Does it sound OK? OTF is an established acronym for OpenType Fonts. Emacs depends on libotf0. I guess the question is, do you think someone wanting to use the existing libotf-dev might also want to use Open Trace Format's dev package? It's unfortunate that Open Trace Format uses the phrase OTF. Would they consider renaming? cya, # -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1334022059.15454.74.camel@B3
