also sprach Sascha Girrulat <sas...@girrulat.de> [2012.03.23.1639 +0100]:
> We think development/administration tools should be also provided
> by Debian and it's also provided at mozilla.org too. Important
> will be a better "be careful" description so everybody knows about
> the risks if this extension will be installed and configured.

Well, my main concern is that the (probably very) few number of
people who would regularly use this and therefore the net benefit of
having it in Debian does not outweigh the danger of making such an
extension more easily accessible to millions of users. It's good
that there are safety precautions, but still.

In any case, the package should probably be named xul-mitm-me to
adhere to the Firefox extension naming scheme.

Cheers,

-- 
 .''`.   martin f. krafft <madduck@d.o>      Related projects:
: :'  :  proud Debian developer               http://debiansystem.info
`. `'`   http://people.debian.org/~madduck    http://vcs-pkg.org
  `-  Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems
 
"i wish i hadn't slept all day, it's really lowered my productivity"
                                                   -- robert mcqueen

Attachment: digital_signature_gpg.asc
Description: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/sig-policy/999bbcc4/current)

Reply via email to