* Marcelo E. Magallon ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote : > >> Sander Smeenk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Your packages are fine, Thom will add 'Provides' lines for the > > apache2-modules packagename. :) Thanks alot for your effort to package > > this. > > These are actually David's packages, I just updated them. > > > > > Now let's lart Thom for compiling apache2 against libdb3, instead of > > > > libdb4, which renders subversion unusable :) > > > Again, I don't know about this... > > > > Thom does :) He didn't want tons of emails questioning where to get > > libdb4 packages. So he said. I need to recompile :) > > I'll take another look at this later, but I'm under the impression > subversion wanted to have libdb4. > Right, the problem is subversion and apache2 have to be compiled with the same version of libdb, otherwise it all goes haywire. Unfortunately libdb4.0 is not in the archive yet, so I had received a huge number of requests for db4.0 packages to go with apache2. rather than step on Matthew Wilcox's toes and create potential problems later I declined to do that and dropped back to using libdb3. Right now, the potential fixes are: (a) I start providing two versions of apache2 (b) the sources are there, if people need db4.0 they're welcome to build with them.
I think that (a) is better from a technical perspective, but it's a pain in the ass ;-) (And no, I really don't have room to do chroot builds). So the solution for the minute is that you guys are gonna have to build against db4 yourselves. Sorry! Cheers, -Thom -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
