On 11/23/2011 07:02 AM, Julien Lavergne wrote: > Argh, bad news :(
Yes, it turns this from a technical issue (package the app, and make sure it meets packaging standards) into a much more difficult "how to keep everyone happy" political issue! > Do we have an idea of the actual diff between the 2 versions ? I'll see if I can diff this over the coming weekend, unless someone else does it first :) > Contacting gtkimageview upstream is a good idea, a backup plan may be > to patch the package in Debian, but it's not a very nice solution :( Another backup plan might be to create a "libviewnior" package with the modified library in it, and then a viewnior package that depends on it and uses it instead of gtkimageview?? But I don't know if Debian would like/accept that as an approach. Jonathan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4ecf15fd.9000...@fastmail.fm
