Hey, Good catch! I separately had started packaging it (the ITP somehow was too far down on Google and I overlooked it) and hadn't noticed these issues. The packaging was so simple using mozilla-devscripts, not much time was wasted.
Concern your last comment, I have found that lots of upstream cannot be bothered to document all the files they copy from other sources. There is not a problem with that by definition, as long as it it compatible with the GPL-2 license of the rest of the source, documented in debian/copyright. However, if I look at base64.js and the linked website, I see that the license is CC-BY 2.0 UK. This is not compatible with the GPL-2! For io.js, the license is MPL... I guess that should be fine. Lastly, nsDragAndDrop.js is part of Firefox it seems, should also be fine. Given that the author(s) state on the project web page that they are so committed to keeping it completely GPL-2, it is weird that they are not willing to respond to your concerns. If you think that it would help if someone else also asks about this, let me know, I will try. Paul -- Using the Power of Debian GNU/Linux | email: pau...@debian.org jabber/gtalk: p...@luon.netl | GnuPG key ID: 0x50064181 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20111102221942.gb3...@density.luon.net
