On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 02:13:15PM -0700, Vagrant Cascadian wrote: > On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 10:41:52AM +0200, berta...@ptitcanardnoir.org wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 02:42:48PM -0700, Vagrant Cascadian wrote: > > > it appears someone has already filed an ITP for convergence: #640786 > > > > > > i've got a git branch too, but haven't pushed it anywhere just yet (what > > > am i > > > waiting for?). > > pushed my branch here: > > http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=users/vagrant/convergence.git
Nice work. Having a look now. > i made a single source package of both the extension and the notary server, > since upstream is maintaining them in a single git tree. although really it > seems like it might make more sense to maintain them as two separate source > packages. > > If we are several people interested to work on this, maybe we can setup a > > team and a git on alioth, or maybe join the pkg-mozext-maintainers team > > and use their infrastructure. What do you think? > > definitely should have some sort of team infrastructure, although the notary > server code might be outside of what the pkg-mozext-maintainers team normally > handles. not sure what would be best. Me too. Maybe we can create a team in alioth that would be the official maintainer for both the client and server packages and ask people from the pkg-mozext-maintainers to join if they want to participate in maintaining the client part. > i should also mention that upstream is not so sure we should package for > debian > until development slows a bit, expecting multiple new versions a week. if we > did upload to debian, experimental might be most appropriate. that said, it > seems like perspectives shouldn't necessarily be removed the moment > convergence > hits debian; it's a little more field tested. Agree. bert. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110920140516.GA3171@localhost
