On Wed, 14 Sep 2011 18:09:21 +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
On 11-09-14 at 04:55pm, Marcin Antczak wrote:
Package name : haml
Haml and Sass have, finally, become independent projects. This is
why
I would like to package this project in new version and replace
current libhaml-ruby package.
Uhm, what you do here is called hijacking.
Please instead take over the libhaml-ruby package. Coordinated with
its
current maintainer(s), of course!
Great that you are interested in this. If you are interested in Sass
as
well, then please join me in maintaining that. :-)
Yes I would like to package Sass too. And I know that my proposal could
be a kind of hijacking but this project is officially splited in two
independent branches maintained in separate repositories, and while
current libhaml-ruby in debian is outdated than I think that we could
abandon libhaml-ruby and replace it with two source packages: haml and
sass.
I also think that current package can be still in use with ruby 1.8
while new version can be packaged with ruby 1.9.
Another question is why source package is called libhaml-ruby while it
should be just haml (it contains binaries - not only library files)...
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/035c11e3dce20ab6e3c8611130bbb...@neutrico.pl
