Hi Rogério, Rogério Brito wrote: > I thought that I had replied to the previous message (to Jérémy) > saying that I did want to have that extension in Debian
Oh, ok. Jérémy told me on IRC, he hasan't received a reply. Well, anyway, we're on the right way again, now. :-) > (mostly because I value more the GPG chain/web-of-trust that we > built than downloading an extension from some site). Hehe. > And, to be honest, the programs that I uploaded to my PPA are really > meant to be *Debian* packages, as that's what I use directly. Yeah, I noticed the "unstable" instead of "maverick" in the last changelog entry. :-) > >> Would you be interested in maintaining this package in Debian? > > > > I'd be very happy, too, if you would do so. Now that version 1.0 is > > released would be a good time for that. :-) > > Great. How do you want me to package it? Just as you did before, only officially for Debian. ;-) > > And I also already have a first patch (to also support the Conkeror > > Xulrunner Application) for your package (the version from the PPA) > > which I attach here as there's no package to report bugs against in > > the BTS yet. :-) > > OK, great to have some improvements already to the released version. I think that patch even is suitable for proposing it to upstream. > I think that, in general, almost all, if not all, xulrunner > applications can benefit from https-everywhere. Right. Others which are in Debian but not in the install.rdf: Songbird, Instantbird, Sunbird, ... > As I am only a Debian maintainer, I don't have permission to write to > your repositories, but if you could add me (my alioth username is > rbrito-guest), that would be cool. See http://wiki.debian.org/Teams/DebianMozExtTeam#Joining > I don't know if you have any preferences/standards, but I like to use > the following workflow with my packages: > > > http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=collab-maint/youtube-dl.git;a=commitdiff;h=e93e4d7 Looks like a more or less vanilla git-buildpackages workflow. Should be fine. http://wiki.debian.org/Teams/DebianMozExtTeam#Common_practices just mentions git, not any way how to use it. And there are dozens way to use git. :-) And I have the feeling that on that wiki page, "branch" really means "repository" and "repository" means "repository directory". At least this is what the list of pkg-mozext repositories look like. (Anyone from the pkg-mozext team can confirm that?) Please ping me when you have 1.0 package ready for review/sponsoring or if you have questions. P.S.: I'm not a pkg-mozext group member, so I don't know all the group's rules. I'm just a subscriber to the pkg-mozext-maintainers mailing list as maintainer of the conkeror package in Debian. Regards, Axel -- ,''`. | Axel Beckert <a...@debian.org>, http://people.debian.org/~abe/ : :' : | Debian Developer, ftp.ch.debian.org Admin `. `' | 1024D: F067 EA27 26B9 C3FC 1486 202E C09E 1D89 9593 0EDE `- | 4096R: 2517 B724 C5F6 CA99 5329 6E61 2FF9 CD59 6126 16B5 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110805210131.gq29...@sym.noone.org
