On , March 19, Adam Di Carlo wrote:
> Mark Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I believe the xhtml stuff is part of sgml-data. (Look in
> > /usr/share/sgml/html/dtd/xml/).
> [...]
> > For the sake of consistency, then, XHTML 1.1 should probably be a part
> > of sgml-data, as well. Else XHTML would have to be split from
> > sgml-data, which is unlikely and, in any event, would be up to Adam
> > DiCarlo.
>
> Eh? No. I've pulled xhtml from the sgml-data package.
Really? Now I'm completely confused. And more so than usual.
What, then, is this xhtml stuff in /usr/share/sgml/html/dtd/xml/1.0/
from sgml-data 1.5.5?
/usr/share/sgml/html/dtd/xml/1.0/xhtml-lat1.ent
/usr/share/sgml/html/dtd/xml/1.0/xhtml-special.ent
/usr/share/sgml/html/dtd/xml/1.0/xhtml-symbol.ent
/usr/share/sgml/html/dtd/xml/1.0/xhtml.soc
/usr/share/sgml/html/dtd/xml/1.0/xhtml1-frameset.dtd
/usr/share/sgml/html/dtd/xml/1.0/xhtml1-strict.dtd
/usr/share/sgml/html/dtd/xml/1.0/xhtml1-transitional.dtd
/usr/share/sgml/html/dtd/xml/1.0/xhtml1.dcl
> It is large enough that it should be packaged separately.
I agree.
> I don't think it's a good idea to add things like xhtml to
> sgml-data.
Ditto.
Mark
_____________________________________
Mark Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Debian SGML <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Home Page: <http://dulug.duke.edu/~mark/>
GPG fp: 50DF A22D 5119 3485 E9E4 89B2 BCBC B2C8 2BE2 FE81
