Hi Adrian, On Sat, 2011-06-04 at 02:45 +0200, Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > Hi, > > have there been any recent developments regarding the packaging?
does not seem so ;(. > I just stumbled across this RFP since a new version of WinUAE was just > released as of June 2 [1] which now has the nice feature that it ships > with the free kickstart replacement developed by the AROS community [2]. > > This means, that WinUAE can be used without having to use the original > kickstart ROMs. So I think it would have been a nice idea to include the > AROS kickstart in the Debian 'puae' package as well. This way, the emulator > will be able to run without any further non-free components which > means that 'puae' could go into 'main'. Hmm, ok. This would be a benefit (for [e-]uae just as well). Wishlist bug? > I am btw the maintainer of the 'kcemu' package [3] which emulates 8 bit > computers made in former East Germany and I would be glad to help with > the packaging of 'puae'. > > I also think it would be ok to drop 'euae' and 'uae' in favour of 'puae' since > the former two don't appear to be actively maintained anymore. Last time I checked, the "puae" software et.al.(tm) wasn't in a state that made me inclined to package it ;), but this may have changed. However, I still only see some git repository really; what state is puae, as a software project, actually in? When it comes to packaging, I guess starting out with the current e-uae packaging as template would be fine; be sure it can co-exist with uae/e-uae though, at least as long as I am not convinced it really obsoletes them. Then again, I also see a debian/ in the git repo, so maybe there is work already done? MfG, Stephan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1311180303.13956.21.ca...@weslok.olx.intra
