Hi Alessandro, in the ITP bug for libapp-cpanminus-perl it was suggested[1] to name the package cpanminus instead. Jonathan suggested that applications from the App::* namespace should in general not be named like modules[2]. I also think it's nicer as cpanminus is not a Perl module, but a (Perl related) application. I would like to know what you think about this.
It would be nice to handle the rename before the package passes the NEW queue and enters the archive (if we decide to do so). Regards, Ansgar [1] <http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=579147#15> [2] <http://lists.debian.org/debian-perl/2011/02/msg00003.html> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87k4h52uvk....@marvin.43-1.org
