> BTW and OT this behavior is racy, could be better to add an xattr with > the last scanning time to the file and compare it ?
http://olivier.sessink.nl/scannedonly/faq.html says: Extended filesystem attributes could have been an option. They take as much space as the 0 byte .scanned: files, and a lookup is quick and has little overhead. However, lots of filesystems do not support extended attributes, so this would limit the usability of the module. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4d25b184.6070...@spam.huckley.de
