On 11/23/2010 02:02 AM, Eugene V. Lyubimkin wrote: > [ CC'ed some interested persons ] > > Hi, > > Thomas, I don't consider the availability of the 'iptables.h' a blocker for > uploading, and here is why. > > The status quo, as I understand, is 'several packages embed miniupnpc in their > source trees'. I considering this situation as much worse than 'single, > properly packaged miniupnpc embedding one single header file'. > > Not having this package also blocks one of my sponsoree's packages to be > updated. > > Please upload your packaging to Debian unstable/experimental soon. Otherwise I > will have to do a hijack attempt (or leave this action for any willing DD in > CC if he/she wants) with sponsoring Adam's packaging which looks overall good > to me except of easily resolvable details.
Hi, I agree with what you say above, and I will work again on building the full of the miniupnp things (libraries, server, client, etc.), even if it means embedding an iptables.h from the kernel sources. Thomas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4ceb8bf6.5020...@goirand.fr
