Your message dated Tue, 15 Jan 2002 14:29:35 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Upstream will maintain the package
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Nov 2001 15:11:17 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Nov 13 09:11:17 2001
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from (paquito.alcove-es) [213.97.251.19]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 163fDY-00058V-00; Tue, 13 Nov 2001 09:11:17 -0600
Received: by paquito.alcove-es (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id C7CB6510; Tue, 13 Nov 2001 16:09:29 +0100 (CET)
From: Alberto Gonzalez Iniesta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: ITP: fake -- IP address takeover tool
X-Reportbug-Version: 1.35
X-Mailer: reportbug 1.35
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2001 16:09:22 +0100
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-BadReturnPath: [EMAIL PROTECTED] rewritten as [EMAIL PROTECTED]
using "From" header
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: wnpp
Version: N/A; reported 2001-11-13
Severity: wishlist
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
* Package name : fake
Upstream Author : Horms <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.ca.us.vergenet.net/linux/fake/
* License : GPL
Description : IP address takeover tool
Fake allows you to take over the IP address of another machine in the
LAN by bringing up an additional interface and making use of ARP
spoofing. The additional interface can be either a physical interface
or an IP alias.
- -- System Information
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux paquito 2.4.14 #2 Tue Nov 6 13:48:28 CET 2001 i686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iD8DBQE78TepxRSvjkukAcMRAozwAKDAJ7cyPf9huT0Pn8Hp074ktPHWXQCeKpR2
ZC9TMNReYDEwUp/9/8HUxWU=
=LK4h
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 119432-done) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Jan 2002 13:29:36 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jan 15 07:29:36 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from 213-96-124-244.uc.nombres.ttd.es (x.inittab.org)
[213.96.124.244]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 16QTei-0003IG-00; Tue, 15 Jan 2002 07:29:36 -0600
Received: by x.inittab.org (Postfix, from userid 1001)
id 43B9CBA1; Tue, 15 Jan 2002 14:29:35 +0100 (CET)
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2002 14:29:35 +0100
From: Alberto Gonzalez Iniesta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Upstream will maintain the package
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
So I retire my ITP
--
Alberto Gonzalez Iniesta | They that give up essential liberty
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | to obtain a little temporary safety
Encrypted mail preferred | deserve neither liberty nor safety.
Key fingerprint = 9782 04E7 2B75 405C F5E9 0C81 C514 AF8E 4BA4 01C3
