W. Martin Borger wrote: > The following tools for TI MSP430 development should be packaged: > > Compiler: gcc-msp430 (http://bugs.debian.org/137712) > Boot loader: msp430-pybsl (http://bugs.debian.org/137829) > Binutils: binutils-msp430 (http://bugs.debian.org/329631) > Debugger: gdb-msp430 (http://bugs.debian.org/510101) > C library: msp430-libc (http://bugs.debian.org/510102) > Simulator: msp430-libc (http://bugs.debian.org/510105) > > Tom Parker has made some Debian packages available here: > http://tevp.net/debian/ > > RPM packages can be found here: > http://cdk4msp.sourceforge.net/
It is my understanding that latest binutils source already contains code for msp430 (gas/config/tc-msp430.c and such). Thus, I think this one bug could be just addressed adding this family to the multiarch flavor of binutils, without requiring a new sourceful package. Anyway, I'm not yet so much skilled in multiarch tricks, and I may as well be plainly wrong in this assumption. So I'm Cc:ing here binutils maintainers for opinions on this. Daniel, Matthias can you please enlighten us on this? If doable, I'll proceed reassigning #329631 to binutils. TIA, Luca -- .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Luca Bruno (kaeso) : :' : The Universal O.S. | lucab (AT) debian.org `. `'` | GPG Key ID: 3BFB9FB3 `- http://www.debian.org | Debian GNU/Linux Developer
pgpzJwgHGRORw.pgp
Description: PGP signature
