On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 12:51 PM, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > Hi Giuseppe, many thanks for your offer, personally I'd like you to go > ahead with your packaging work on chromium-browser to at least have the > *possibility* of getting the package in squeeze. That means having it in > unstable first, then we'll use the usual rules for transition to testing > of all other packages.
or experimental. > Regarding security issues, I duly notice that Giuseppe is a full member > of the Debian security team, so I believe we should trust his judgement > on that. webkit related security issues are real and I'm well placed to know about it. I would like to hear Giuseppe about his concerns wrt this point. > All in all, it would be an incredible pity not to have chromium-browser > in Debian and probably a good argument for a lot of desktop users to use > another Debian-based distribution (say, Ubuntu). Many Debian users prefers to use Google Chrome repository. > No matter what, we've clear processes for this kind of issues and I > think we should use them rather then simply not uploading the package > and stopping other developers motivated in doing that, by fiddling with > the owner of this ITP. > > If you ask me, I'd like Giuseppe to take back ownership of this bug > report and go ahead with the packaging work. IMHO, common sense is preferred here. I don't see the problem for Giuseppe to team up with Alexander (and Fabien Tassin) and finally push a package in experimental. 1st step: upload gyp to Debian ! Cheers, Fathi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/n2j6a2e33621004220310p32350et45afe0aa66ed2...@mail.gmail.com
