Your message dated Wed, 26 Dec 2001 16:21:18 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line no longer intend to package
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Aug 2001 01:08:05 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Aug 22 20:08:05 2001
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from a3a32419.sympatico.bconnected.net (tolkien) [209.53.24.88]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 15Ziya-0001sq-00; Wed, 22 Aug 2001 20:08:04 -0500
Received: by tolkien (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 7CB329733B; Wed, 22 Aug 2001 18:07:58 -0700 (PDT)
From: Luca Filipozzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: ITP: synopsis -- Synopsis is a general source code documentation tool.
X-Reportbug-Version: 1.23
X-Mailer: reportbug 1.23
Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2001 18:07:58 -0700
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: wnpp
Version: N/A; reported 2001-08-22
Severity: wishlist
I intend to package synopsis.
I have contacted upstream and he has no objections.
Description
-----------
Synopsis is a general source code documentation tool. By means of a
modular structure it adapts to different styles of embedded
documentation, different programming languages and various output
formats. It scales well with the size of the project by allowing
processing to be controlled by Makefiles.
The original goal of this project was to be able to generate a
reference manual for a project we are working on which uses different
programming lanugages: the protocols are defined with IDL and the
implementation is written in C++. There are no tools to support
document generation with explicit cross references between both parts.
When thinking about how to design a tool which is able to do that, it
was quickly concluded that other parts could be 'outsourced' into
separate modules as well, such as the formatting of the generated
syntax tree. These are a couple of ideas which hopefully make it a tool
which is useful in a wide range of projects.
Upstream
--------
author: Stefan Seefeld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
website: synopsis.sourceforge.net
source: http://sourceforge.net/projects/synopsis/
-- System Information
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux tolkien 2.2.19-tolkien #1 Thu Apr 12 14:26:43 PDT 2001 i686
Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 109707-done) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Dec 2001 00:21:19 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Dec 26 18:21:19 2001
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from a3a32419.sympatico.bconnected.net (tolkien) [209.53.25.152]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 16JOIR-0004Ac-00; Wed, 26 Dec 2001 18:21:19 -0600
Received: by tolkien (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id B95089725A; Wed, 26 Dec 2001 16:21:18 -0800 (PST)
Date: Wed, 26 Dec 2001 16:21:18 -0800
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: no longer intend to package
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.24i
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Luca Filipozzi)
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I am closing this ITP since I have not acted on my intention to date.
Luca
--
Luca Filipozzi
[dpkg] We are the apt. Resistance is futile. You will be packaged.
