Jan, hi,

[ Cc'ing the ITP ]

Jan Wagner wrote:
> I agree with you, that maintaining the package isn't a big trick. From the 
> last releases, the biggest issue was the review of the copyright/license 
> changes and probably maintaining additional patches.
I'm not sure if you follow upstream's list so I'll repeat some stuff anyway.

Some months ago I contacted some of the original authors about the
licensing mess. The main author, Cengiz Alaettinoglu, who did the work
for ISI/USC back then but has since left, promptly replied and was able
to reach some of his old colleagues who convinced USC's management to a
relicensing.

All in all, we had a happy ending and all of the weird non-free
licensing, including the stuff that had IBM copyrights(!) have been
cleared and the license has been replaced by a standard MIT one!

Nick and Shane were aware of this and were holding off the 5.0.0 release
(the cruft-cleanout one)  so that it can be released with the new
license. 4.8.6 (= MIT-licensed 4.8.5) was released today, so 5.0.0 will
soon follow.

However, there are also some bad news: the project has been pronounced
dead at the last RIPE summit by Nick. He has worked on it for over a
year and decided that the software is broken beyond repair -- he's the
one that cleaned up all the cruft. I objected and several others were
not very happy about it; if you're not subscribed, have a look at the
archives for the discussion that followed.

I'm not sure how to proceed. I think the best course would be to wait a
bit and see before uploading to Debian.

Regards,
Faidon



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4ba03b0e.30...@debian.org

Reply via email to