(Remember to keep the bug report in Cc on your messages if you want them included in the report.)
On 28-Jan-2010, Michael Lustfield wrote:
> Ben Finney <ben+deb...@benfinney.id.au> wrote:
> > Do you need to qualify the window manager with “light weight”? I
> > get the impression that it should work in any window manager that
> > supports docking.
> >
> > Is the term “applet” applicable? How about:
> >
> > dockable clock applet for various window managers
>
> It also works in window managers that don't support the dock.
Okay, then I would recommend not mentioning “dock” in the synopsis.
> I just wanted to emphasize light weight somewhere because the code
> base is VERY small. The code is only ~300 lines long iirc.
What about:
low-footprint clock applet for various window managers
An alternatives to “low-footprint” might be “low-resource”.
--
\ “We cannot solve our problems with the same thinking we used |
`\ when we created them.” —Albert Einstein |
_o__) |
Ben Finney <b...@benfinney.id.au>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
