On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 10:48 AM, Samuel Thibault <sthiba...@debian.org> wrote: > Martin Koegler, le Tue 19 Jan 2010 09:27:07 +0100, a écrit : >> Samuel Thibault <sthiba...@debian.org> wrote: >> > Marc Leeman, le Sun 17 Jan 2010 22:16:17 +0100, a écrit : >> > > * Package name : pthsem >> > [..] > > The problem is that people know pth, but they don't know pthsem (yet). > It will be a long time before people discover that there is a new > interesting pthsem package that basically does the same as pth with > quite a few extra features, is not dead etc. Why not just replacing the > existing pth package with pthsem to avoid that delay?
Why not creating a dummy package pth with only compat mode ? This package will be transationnal and will provide a depend to pthsem Regards Bastien -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
