Mon, Dec 03, 2001 at 09:26:23PM +0000 wrote: > On Fri, Nov 30, 2001 at 06:59:14PM -0800, David Kimdon wrote: > > 1. Berkeley db 3.3 - a bug has been filed (http::/bugs.debian.org/109853) > > I have been building with the preliminary packages on > > people.debian.org/~dwhedon/debian/. > > db3 is priority: required and is therefore frozen for the woody release. > with 5 days to go until everything which depends on it is locked down, > i'm less than keen on touching it.
FWIW, the db3.3-3.3.11 packages at people.debian.org/~dwhedon/debian/ were put together so that they can co-exist with the current db3 packages in much the same way that the db2 packages can co-exist with the db3 pacakges. With that in mind it isn't a question of touching db3, rather the question is do we add db3.3 packages to the archive. I understand if you don't want to do that. > > Subversion will make its way into Debian shortly after these > > dependancies. With this mail I am poking the respective maintainers > > to see where we stand. > > No subversion for woody. I'll get db 3.3 sorted out once woody is out > of the way. I see where you are coming from. I would, however, like to make subversion available soon if possible. I can just leave the packages on people.debian.org, though there has been some discussion of moving them to experimental. -David
