Your message dated Sun, 18 Nov 2001 05:15:43 +0900 (JST)
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Regarding your RFP of GUSPATCH-tools
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Nov 2000 16:12:36 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Nov 19 10:12:36 2000
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from brotherhood.netfort.gr.jp [210.160.182.75]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 13xX52-0007ZL-00; Sun, 19 Nov 2000 10:12:36 -0600
Received: from uekawa.netfort.gr.jp (pl026.nas114.uji.nttpc.ne.jp
[210.153.139.154])
by brotherhood.netfort.gr.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 2DA48CF36; Mon, 20 Nov 2000 01:23:47 +0900 (JST)
Received: from dancer by uekawa.netfort.gr.jp with local (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian))
id 13xX35-00052P-00; Mon, 20 Nov 2000 01:10:35 +0900
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RFP: GUSPATCH-tools - wav2pat converter with enhancements over
original timidity version
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailer: bug 3.3.6
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Junichi Uekawa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2000 01:10:35 +0900
X-BadReturnPath: [EMAIL PROTECTED] rewritten as [EMAIL PROTECTED]
using "From" header
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: wnpp
Version: N/A
Severity: wishlist
GUSPATCH-tools is a wav2pat converter useful for using with Timidity.
Timidity++ seems to have dropped wav2pat.
It is available at :
http://perso.cybercable.fr/martelli/guspatch-tools.html
http://perso.cybercable.fr/martelli/guspatch-tools-0.1.tar.gz
LICENSE: GPL
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 77443-done) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Nov 2001 20:32:12 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Nov 17 14:32:12 2001
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mikilab.doshisha.ac.jp [202.23.156.50]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 165C8J-0006Q9-00; Sat, 17 Nov 2001 14:32:11 -0600
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by mikilab.doshisha.ac.jp (8.9.3/3.7W) with ESMTP id FAA16614;
Sun, 18 Nov 2001 05:18:21 +0900
Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2001 05:15:43 +0900 (JST)
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Regarding your RFP of GUSPATCH-tools
From: Junichi Uekawa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Mailer: Mew version 2.0.56 on Emacs 21.1 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In Sat, 17 Nov 2001 20:12:50 +0100 (CET), Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> immo
vero scripsit
bunk> some time ago you sent a RFP for GUSPATCH-tools. I looked at the homepage
bunk> of the project at [1] that you mentioned in your RFP and there's still
bunk> only version 0.1. Do I assume right that this project is dead and do you
bunk> agree to close this RFP?
This was a portion of code removed from timidity package by accident,
and I was hoping to have a package of this, however,
SMURF seems to be a far superior software (although it seems to be
limited to GTK+ version only, where GUSpatch tools can be invoked
easily from a shell script).
I'd say it is fine to close this bug.
Thanks for your work!
regards,
junichi
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer
