So, this seems to be the case, we can go forward. Please Build-depend: ladspa-sdk-dev
ladspa-sdk will contain the sample plugins, and ladspa-sdk-dev would contain the header files and documentation. Begin forwarded message: Date: Wed, 9 May 2001 00:13:55 +0100 From: "Richard W.E. Furse" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <linux-audio-dev@ginette.musique.umontreal.ca> Subject: LADSPA LGPL Shock Against all expectation I've managed to find time to do a LGPL release of LADSPA. I'm not entirely happy about this scenario - see http://www.ladspa.org/cmt/license.html and http://www.ladspa.org/ladspa_sdk/license.html for some issues. However this approach puts at least some license on LADSPA so that it can be released in Linux distributions - it will need tweaking to make it less restrictive so that it can be used with closed-source hosts and plugins. Any lawyers out there? Apologies to everyone for the delay, and thanks to Kai who suggested more-or-less this approach to me weeks ago... --Richard
