Your message dated Thu, 01 Mar 2001 14:56:59 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#84521: fixed in gedit 0.9.4-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 2 Feb 2001 18:39:33 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Feb 02 12:39:33 2001
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from matrix05.home.net.pl [::ffff:212.85.112.5] 
        by master.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
        id 14Ol7M-0001Ys-00; Fri, 02 Feb 2001 12:39:32 -0600
Received: from pe48.warszawa.cvx.ppp.tpnet.pl (HELO dune) (213.76.100.48)
  by matrix05.home.net.pl with SMTP; 2 Feb 2001 18:40:22 -0000
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
From: Mariusz Przygodzki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: O: gedit
Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2001 19:43:33 +0100
X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.2]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Package: wnpp
Severity: normal


---------------------------------------
Received: (at 84521-close) by bugs.debian.org; 1 Mar 2001 19:59:43 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Mar 01 13:59:43 2001
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from auric.debian.org [::ffff:206.246.226.45] 
        by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
        id 14YZEl-0006Cj-00; Thu, 01 Mar 2001 13:59:43 -0600
Received: from troup by auric.debian.org with local (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
        id 14YZC7-0003kU-00; Thu, 01 Mar 2001 14:56:59 -0500
From: Joe Drew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Bug#84521: fixed in gedit 0.9.4-2
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: James Troup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 01 Mar 2001 14:56:59 -0500
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
gedit, which has been installed in the Debian FTP archive:

gedit_0.9.4-2.dsc
  to pool/main/g/gedit/gedit_0.9.4-2.dsc
gedit_0.9.4-2_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/gedit/gedit_0.9.4-2_i386.deb
gedit_0.9.4-2.diff.gz
  to pool/main/g/gedit/gedit_0.9.4-2.diff.gz
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Joe Drew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated gedit package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2001 22:49:39 -0500
Source: gedit
Binary: gedit
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.9.4-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Joe Drew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Joe Drew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description: 
 gedit      - Light-weight text editor
Closes: 84067 84521
Changes: 
 gedit (0.9.4-2) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * New maintainer (Closes: Bug#84521)
   * Can't reproduce bug, but put in preventative directory entries into
     deb file which should stop this from happening (Closes: Bug#84067)
   * Upgraded standards version to 3.5.2, implemented DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS
Files: 
 e76807313a09a8e094e1dc78001150b2 756 editors optional gedit_0.9.4-2.dsc
 3a5e7aff9922c35f624c07a584da049b 6306 editors optional gedit_0.9.4-2.diff.gz
 b06d49356bc0fa22a2035a3c7882532e 636276 editors optional gedit_0.9.4-2_i386.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE6ncgRo7ginaV9i/cRAv7TAKDTWL/MyB23xDqq788Xm1LZaXfTJgCfWkfn
PgM+euwpGGpZ9kfKgCzDxz8=
=BrSY
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Reply via email to