Sven Mueller wrote:
Philippe COVAL wrote on 27/04/2005 09:42:
That's a terrible package name.
I agrea this can be confusing, but I was the original name
BTW, there is a duplicate ITP :
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=306268
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=294943
She suggested to rename it "ssh-proxy-connect" , this sounds good to me, if noone is against that name I will repackage it (check in a few days : http://rzr.online.fr/docs/contribs/debian/?M=A ) .
I am waiting sonia answers to my emails, to merge our work if needed.
I would suggest not using "ssh" in the package name. The software can be used for many other things than just providing a clean TCP tunnel for ssh. In fact it can be used by almost any application which needs a clean TCP tunnel.
so, let's go for connect-proxy ? (connect 1st, because it will show up if user search for connect command line )
Another note: It might be worth mentioning that its HTTP-Proxy tunnel won't work with content-inspection firewalls which will drop any connection established by a CONNECT which do not use SSL. Many companies use such firewalls.
I updated the manpage
A new candidate is online : http://rzr.online.fr/docs/contribs/debian/?M=D
I added the close trigger in the changelog too
Are u using any messaging service ? it'll go faster
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
