Thijs Kinkhorst wrote: > However, I'm not sure about whether there's still an interest in the > package. The last upstream version is from 2003, and there's not much > bug-traffic about it (near to none). What do you think, it it still > sensible for Debian to ship this package? Do you have a clue whether > it's actually being used?
The main reason for ctn to be Debian, IMO, is that my computed tomography simulator CTSim depends on ctn for importing and exporting DICOM images. > On the other hand, since it has already been packaged and no critical > bugs are open, currently the only thing needed is to "keep an eye" on > the package, just in case any problems arise with it in the future. So > if there's still some need for it, I'm willing to take over that function. Thanks, Thijs! Are you in the New Maintainer Queue? -- Kevin Rosenberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
