On Tue, 2005-02-15 at 10:34 +0100, Eduard Bloch wrote: > #include <hallo.h> > * David Moreno Garza [Mon, Feb 14 2005, 02:56:12PM]: > > > * Package name : sendemail > > Version : 1.51 > > Upstream Author : Brandon Zehm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > * URL : http://caspian.dotconf.net/menu/Software/SendEmail/ > > * License : GPL with a non-free clause (non-free package) > > You should have good reasons to get non-free crap into Debian.
It would not be officially into Debian's archive. Please take a look into the Social Contract of Debian to learn about the commitment of the project to its users and the understanding of some of free software user needs, as well as the explanation on supporting the non-free section. I do not like non-free software, not misunderstand also, what I'm trying to say, I just understand why Debian's Social Contract explains the non-free section. Anyway, sendEmail is released under GPL with a non-DFSG-compatible clause, which stands: *** The use of this software for sending spam *** *** or unsolicited email is explicitly denied *** This would obviously violate DFSG #6. But, in this case, I probably it could be justificable. Anyway, I'm trying to convince upstream author to change the license, since I really like his software and I'd like to have it integrated officially into Debian. > And we have already at least two packages serving this purpose (ssmtp, > nullmailer). How is this one different? Because I find it easy to use, and I think other users will find it as well. > PS: instead of the 1001st smtp-mailer agent, I would like to see a > compact local-nullmailer (sendmail command just writing to > /var/spool/mail or procmail pipe). So write it. -- David Moreno Garza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | http://www.damog.net/ *** Quits: TITANIC (Excess Flood) GPG: C671257D - 6EF6 C284 C95D 78F6 0B78 FFD3 981C 5FD7 C671 257D -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
