Your message dated Sun, 13 Feb 2005 18:05:25 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#245124: fixed in xfce4-systemload-plugin 0.3.6-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Apr 2004 14:54:46 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Apr 21 07:54:46 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail010.syd.optusnet.com.au [211.29.132.56]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BGJ7d-0004PW-00; Wed, 21 Apr 2004 07:54:45 -0700
Received: from espresso.caffeine (c211-30-26-231.mirnd1.nsw.optusnet.com.au
[211.30.26.231])
by mail010.syd.optusnet.com.au (8.11.6p2/8.11.6) with ESMTP id
i3LEsdB25212;
Thu, 22 Apr 2004 00:54:40 +1000
Received: from netsnipe by espresso.caffeine with local (Exim 4.32)
id 1BGJ7X-0005yB-C0; Thu, 22 Apr 2004 00:54:39 +1000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Andrew Lau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: O: xfce4-systemload-plugin
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.56
Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2004 00:54:39 +1000
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Andrew Lau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 9
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2004/debian-devel-200403/msg02452.html
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.5
Locale: LANG=en_AU.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_AU.UTF-8
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 245124-close) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Feb 2005 23:08:02 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Feb 13 15:08:01 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1D0SqP-0008T6-00; Sun, 13 Feb 2005 15:08:01 -0800
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1D0Snt-000500-00; Sun, 13 Feb 2005 18:05:25 -0500
From: Emanuele Rocca <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $
Subject: Bug#245124: fixed in xfce4-systemload-plugin 0.3.6-1
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2005 18:05:25 -0500
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Source: xfce4-systemload-plugin
Source-Version: 0.3.6-1
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
xfce4-systemload-plugin, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
xfce4-systemload-plugin_0.3.6-1.diff.gz
to pool/main/x/xfce4-systemload-plugin/xfce4-systemload-plugin_0.3.6-1.diff.gz
xfce4-systemload-plugin_0.3.6-1.dsc
to pool/main/x/xfce4-systemload-plugin/xfce4-systemload-plugin_0.3.6-1.dsc
xfce4-systemload-plugin_0.3.6-1_i386.deb
to
pool/main/x/xfce4-systemload-plugin/xfce4-systemload-plugin_0.3.6-1_i386.deb
xfce4-systemload-plugin_0.3.6.orig.tar.gz
to
pool/main/x/xfce4-systemload-plugin/xfce4-systemload-plugin_0.3.6.orig.tar.gz
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Emanuele Rocca <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated xfce4-systemload-plugin
package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 29 Jan 2005 21:29:44 +0100
Source: xfce4-systemload-plugin
Binary: xfce4-systemload-plugin
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.3.6-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Xfce Maintainers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Emanuele Rocca <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description:
xfce4-systemload-plugin - system load monitor plugin for the XFce4 panel
Closes: 245124
Changes:
xfce4-systemload-plugin (0.3.6-1) unstable; urgency=low
.
* (Rudy Godoy)
+ New Maintainer (Closes: #245124)
+ New upstream release
+ Added spanish translation
+ Fixed short description uppercase
+ Added gmo files cleaning to distclean target on po/Makefile.in.in
* (Emanuele Rocca)
+ Switched to simple-patchsys.mk (CDBS)
+ Added auto update of libtool, aclocal and autoconf and
build-dependenices on them
Files:
cb1a1fa0a46b4cff63e9a6ac30061671 882 x11 optional
xfce4-systemload-plugin_0.3.6-1.dsc
fd73efa3bd7a73e3f5fdf8d4ed848c1f 229985 x11 optional
xfce4-systemload-plugin_0.3.6.orig.tar.gz
5dda7fd00451501d45d8bfc4008e3188 28033 x11 optional
xfce4-systemload-plugin_0.3.6-1.diff.gz
71b77c3fa4bc46de26c49a9921128aba 19426 x11 optional
xfce4-systemload-plugin_0.3.6-1_i386.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFCD9LNC6DuA+rxm2ARAmQlAKCL+vl0YBtv8z6oMZHeGUkDpT8xIACdFhGQ
d16O0el2+9OE4AUeoZbQSAM=
=jfrE
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
