Hi, On Sat, Mar 30, 2024 at 03:05:03PM -0700, Vagrant Cascadian wrote: > On 2024-03-30, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 29, 2024 at 07:38:35PM -0700, Vagrant Cascadian wrote: > >> Philipp Kern asked about trying to do reproducible builds checks for > >> recent security updates to try to gain confidence about Debian's buildd > >> infrastructure, given that they run builds in sid chroots which may have > >> used or built or run a vulnerable xz-utils... > ... > > Thanks a lot for doing this verification work! > > It is such an obvious application for Reproducible Builds that many > people have worked on for many years. So... I daresay, my pleasure and > honor. :) > > > > There would be an upcoming (or actually postponed) util-linux update > > as well. Could you as extra paranoia please verify these here as well > > (I assume its enough for you that the source package is signed, I > > stripped the signature from the changes): > > > > https://people.debian.org/~carnil/tmp/util-linux/ > > I don't see any source packages there, just .deb .changes and signed > .buildinfo files! The signed .buildinfo files are great, but would > definitely need the source code ... looks like the util-linux changes > are in a git branch, but a signed .dsc would be nice just to be sure I > am testing the same thing. That said, testing from git and getting > bit-for-bit identical results ... would be confidence inspiring! > Hmmm. Might just go for it, and if we have issues, maybe try to dig up > the .dsc? :)
Sorry that was my fault obviously. The orig,tar.xz debian.tar.xz and dsc files are now there as well. Regards, Salvatore
