On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 09:23:57PM +0200, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 09:04:34PM +0300, Niko Tyni wrote: > > Given Kurt's earlier answer above, I expect they need a jessie backport. > > I was involved in the dose3 backports, and as of now the version in. > jessie-backports is completely up to date with stable, and wuiet.d.o is > using it. > > Now, I see that #867104 and #864906 have been closed yesterday in > unstable. > https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-ocaml-maint/packages/dose3.git/commit/?id=42aa4c43aac0357aa59d2a1b2d9d640cd5f10dc1 > > Now I'm unsure what's the best way to get that fix in wuiet.d.o. > The options here are probably: > > 1. upload to stretch, upgrade wuiet to stretch > 2. upload to stretch, then to jessie-bpo > 3. upload to stretch-bpo, upgrade wuiet to stretch > 4. asking for exception to the backports' rules and backport the fix > to jessie-bpo without fixing stretch
uploading to stretch will unfortunately require a trivial backport, which consists just in dropping one build-dependency (ocamlbuild). We will need that anyway, so I will prepare it in the git right now. Remains the question whether we also need the backport to jessie, which would require more work. -Ralf.
