On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 12:14 AM, Kurt Roeckx <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, Dec 09, 2013 at 01:32:03PM +0100, Mathieu Malaterre wrote: >> while at it >> >> On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 9:45 AM, Mathieu Malaterre <[email protected]> wrote: >> > Something apparently went wrong during build of flann, so please give >> > back flann on kfreebsd-amd64 & mips: >> > >> > gb flann_1.8.4-3 . mips kfreebsd-amd64 >> > >> > thanks >> >> gb flann_1.8.4-3 . mipsel > > It's already gave ICE on kfreebsd-amd64 twice, I don't think a > third time is going to fix that. > > On mips and mipsel is seems to time out, and giving it back there > is likely also not going to produce the results you want. Is that > file known to take a long time to build or use a lot of RAM?
flann is a beast to compile, they do some funky stuff with the linker for "optimisation"... I am suprised about kfreed-amd64, it build fine in the past: https://buildd.debian.org/status/logs.php?pkg=flann&arch=kfreebsd-amd64 Looking at -2, it gives: .... Architecture: kfreebsd-amd64 Build-Space: 576528 Build-Time: 2649 .... mips seemed ok in the past: https://buildd.debian.org/status/logs.php?pkg=flann&arch=mips while mipsel already did show some issues back then: https://buildd.debian.org/status/logs.php?pkg=flann&arch=mipsel HTH -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/ca+7wuswxtrbnuguzgd91xhzx9iapcmbf9fdm0arrp9vr8td...@mail.gmail.com
