On Sun, Oct 13, 2013 at 09:24:55 -0400, James McCoy wrote:

> The armhf build seems to have been the victim of a flaky test.  The
> handling of this was supposed to have been fixed upstream, but if builds
> continue failing, I'll reinstate my own checks in d/rules to avoid
> wasting buildd time.
> 
>   gb vim . armhf
> 
Given back.

Cheers,
Julien

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to