On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 10:51:36PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote: > > > > I'd rather see the binNMU version in the installed_version field - after > > all, for that architecture, that is the version that is installed. When > > filing a binNMU it is confusing to first see it go from 1.0-1 > > (Installed) to 1.0-1+b1 (Needs-Build) to 1.0-1+b1 (Built) to 1.0-1 > > (Installed). I'd expect it to stay at 1.0-1+b1 (Installed), if you know > > what I mean. > > Eh, I need to translate myself I assume: > "I would tend to put the version number including the binary epoch > (e.g. 1.2.3+b1) in all fields, ...".
I'm not sure how you'll get that to work, because you wouldn't know what the source version is anymore? Kurt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
