On 14/08/26 at 17:06 +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > On Fri, Aug 14, 2026 at 04:14:40PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On 12/08/26 at 12:50 +0800, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > > > It would be nice if someone can make sure we have good short sentences > > > for the ballot. > > > > In https://lists.debian.org/debian-vote/2026/08/msg00231.html I came up > > with: > > > > A - Ban LLM usage via SC > > G - Ban LLM output; assistive use allowed > > C - Ban LLM in messages-to-humans via CoC; discourage LLM use elsewhere > > H - Discourage; climate destruction is the deal-breaker > > F - Cautious-avoid: encourages avoidance where practical > > B - Permit AI-assisted work with conditions > > D - Accept AI contributions > > E - Neutral: neither endorses nor prohibits > > > > Since they come from me and I'm obviously biased in this discussion, > > they would have to be double-checked/confirmed, but maybe they are > > useful as a basis. > > So I had: > A: Choice 1: Ban LLM contributions from Debian via Social Contract > B: Choice 2: Allow AI-Assisted Contributions > C: Choice 3: Reject LLMs as far as practical, update Code of Conduct > D: Choice 4: Accept AI contributions for Debian specific work > E: Choice 5: Responsible Use of Generative AI > F: Choice 6: A cautious approach to generative AI > G: Choice 7: Debian is created by humans > H: Choice 8: Avoid the use of LLM; climate destruction is a deal breaker > > That is, for optoins B, D, E, F and G I have used the text of the > proposer.
ACK, that makes sense > But the difference between B and D isn't really clear from that. For B I think adding "with conditions" would make sense (speaking as the proposer). D also includes some conditions but they are less explicit than with B. Lucas
