On Thu, Aug 13, 2026 at 05:15:07PM +0900, Simon Richter wrote:
On 8/12/26 11:27 PM, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
So, if your proposal were to pass, that means that services such as
debaudit.debian.net (developed with massive AI assistance) or
udd.debian.org (maintained and developed with AI assistance since about
a year ago) should be shutdown, right?
If you require AI services to maintain these properly, then we need a
contingency plan for these services anyway for when the cost of tokens
is no longer subsidized.
This is very close to an ad personam attack, so please be careful what
you say when the discussion gets a bit hotter. We don't know yet whether
it is okay to keep AI contributed stuff that already exists, so maybe
we'll end up without debaudit or udd anyway, and why would Lucas waste
his personal time to do manual work when there is (still) a machine
available doing the job.
If you expect that AI assistance will become unaffordable for Debian in
the near future, why are you pursuing a ban?
Greetings
Marc
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Marc Haber | "I don't trust Computers. They | Mailadresse im Header
Leimen, Germany | lose things." Winona Ryder | Fon: *49 6224 1600402
Nordisch by Nature | How to make an American Quilt | Fax: *49 6224 1600421
