Agreed.
On Thu, 8 May 2025 at 17:52, Sam Hartman <hartm...@debian.org> wrote:
>
> >>>>> "Stefano" == Stefano Zacchiroli <z...@debian.org> writes:
>
>
> Stefano> Either way, having a single option would certainly be
> Stefano> better than having two, in terms of reaching the needed
> Stefano> quorum for an alternative option to be on the
> Stefano> ballot. (Assuming you two are fine with "merging" the
> Stefano> proposals, of course.)
>
> I don't see this at all.
> I don't see anyone stepping forward and saying they would sponsor a
> merged proposal but not one of the existing proposals.
> I've sponsored Aigars's proposal. I don't think he likes my option
> enough to sponsor it.
> I would encourage you to sponsor his proposal if you have not done so.
>
> I think our voting system deals well with ballot options, so I've never
> bought into the desire to minimize ballot options.
> I'm absolutely happy to work with Aigars to minimize differences between
> our proposals and to highlight those differences, not out of a desire to
> get a single merged proposal, but out of a desire to be clear what we
> are voting for.
>
--
Best regards,
Aigars Mahinovs
