> > Wikipedia includes this citation: > > "" However, many AI applications are not perceived as AI: "A lot of cutting > > edge AI has filtered into general applications, often without being > > called AI because once something becomes useful enough and common enough > > it's not labeled AI anymore."[2][3] "" > > <https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Artificial_intelligence&oldid=1286364868> > > I agree with you. However, it is a term firmly set in the mind of too many > people.
But for how long ? > Keep in mind Mo Zhou's proposal is in a large way an answer to > OSI's OSAID⁴, which many among us feel to be a gross mistake. > > ⁴ > https://opensource.org/blog/the-open-source-initiative-announces-the-release-of-the-industrys-first-open-source-ai-definition > > Too many people (both "in the trade" and not) recognize the term AI. But in 5 years, they will associate AI to something quite different from today LLM, but Debian will be stuck with this term in its policy documents, causing confusion. Cheers, -- Bill. <ballo...@debian.org> Imagine a large red swirl here.
