Quoting Salvo Tomaselli (2024-06-26 10:29:53) > > I am sure that's also what you meant, Salvo, I just find it quite > > relevant to be explicit that it is the care that need a boost, not the > > amount of signatures. > > Well if you manually check very carefully every line and then don't sign… > it's > harder to discover it got modified.
Yes, I agree. We can encourage upstream to... a) sign b) sign what is carefully checked c) carefully check (and not sign) Assuming good faith, I believe that in your earlier email you meant b) although you only wrote a). Now in your followup email you say that c) is not as good. I agree with your earlier, explicit point that a) is good. I agree with your earlier (assumed) implied point, that b) is good. I agree with you new point, that c) is not as good. My point is that *explicitly* encouraging b) is better than *implicitly* encouraging it by explicitly saying only a). - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ * Sponsorship: https://ko-fi.com/drjones [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private
signature.asc
Description: signature
