Removing nearly all usefulness from the system and preventing it from getting more useful over time is not a compromise. That is blocking by a wrecking amendment.
On Thu, 20 Jun 2024, 01:03 Ansgar 🙀, <ans...@43-1.org> wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, 2024-06-19 at 14:43 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote: > > I don't think it's bad in any inherent way, but it's not tag2upload. > It's > > not the thing that the developers have been working on, it doesn't solve > > the problems they're trying to solve, and it doesn't let people use the > > workflows that they want to support. > > You basically say "nothing would work at all". > > Is any change a hard blocker from the tag2upload team perspective? Or > is there some room for changes, even though it would be a design that > is not identical to the one currently proposed by the tag2upload > developers? > > Because from my perspective it mostly looks like us like ftp-master > willing to find some compromise, but the tag2upload side hard blocking > on any possible change. > > If there is absolutely no space for changes, then it's probably not > useful to have any discussion as we would just turn in circles. > > Ansgar > >
