On Sun, Jun 16, 2024 at 03:31:25PM +0200, Matthias Urlichs wrote: > On 13.06.24 10:26, Sean Whitton wrote: > > Yes. A proposal that has not yet engaged with the complexities of > > 3.0 (quilt) is not one in which we can yet have any confidence. > > The proposal simply intends to do whatever the uploader would do to build > the source package from a tagged git worktree, except in a controlled and > sandboxed environment. > > I fail to understand why we should have any less confidence in that than in > whatever the uploader does manually to achieve the same result (we hope!!).
One could argue that neiter matter. It is the outcome that matters: the source package itself. That's what gets distributed. > > -- > -- regards > -- > -- Matthias Urlichs > --
