On Fri, 8 Dec 2023 at 23:04, Bart Martens <ba...@debian.org> wrote: > > On Fri, Dec 08, 2023 at 10:06:45PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On 08/12/23 at 21:58 +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > > > [ ] Choice 1: CRA and PLD proposals include regulations detrimental to > > > FOSS > > > [ ] Choice 2: The EU should clarify that non-commercial FOSS is exempted > > > > "non-commercial FOSS" sounds like CC BY-NC-SA (which is not FOSS). What > > this option is trying to say is that FOSS development outside commercial > > context should be exempted (or non-commercial FOSS organizations). > > > > However I cannot find a wording that fits on a single line... > > Maybe this? > [ ] Choice 2: The EU should exempt non-commercial use of FOSS"
It's not just use, development too. Maybe: "CRA and PLD proposals should only apply to commercial ventures"
