* Judit Foglszinger: " Ballot option 2 - Merely hide Identities of Developers Casting a Particular Vote and allow verification" (Thu, 24 Feb 2022 05:44:34 +0700):
I sponsor this option.
Like others said: changing the vote system should be proposed in a
separate GR.
> I propose a ballot option for the GR
> "Hide Identities of Developers Casting a Particular Vote"
> that makes the following changes to the constitution.
>
> 1) Do not make the identity of a voter casting a particular vote public.
>
> 6) Codify that our election system must permit independent verification
> of the outcome given the votes cast and must permit developers to
> confirm their vote is included in the votes cast.
>
> So it's the proposed GR minus the changes
> not directly related to introducing secret votes.
>
> I ask for seconds aka sponsors for this Option.
>
> Rationale
> =========
>
> Give the opportunity to vote for secret voting without needing to
> additionally vote for unrelated/only slightly related
> constitution changes;
> for example for the change of mode of voting
> from email to something not defined.
>
> As it was mentioned in the discussion,
> there might be no consensus on which options are direcly related -
> This option regards the need to allow verification (6))
> as directly related to secret votes, because otherwise
> they would become completely unverifiable.
>
> Summary of Changes
> ==================
>
> 1) Do not make the identity of a voter casting a particular vote
> public.
>
> 6) Codify that our election system must permit independent verification
> of the outcome given the votes cast and must permit developers to
> confirm their vote is included in the votes cast.
>
>
> <h3>4.2. Procedure</h3>
> @@ -228,9 +246,10 @@ earlier can overrule everyone listed later.</cite></p>
> <p>
> Votes are taken by the Project Secretary. Votes, tallies, and
> results are not revealed during the voting period; after the
> vote the Project Secretary lists all the votes {+cast in sufficient
> detail that anyone may verify the outcome of the election from the votes
> cast. The+} {+ identity of a developer casting a particular vote is not
> made+} {+ public, but developers will be given an option to confirm
> their vote is included in the votes+} cast.
>
> @@ -371,8 +390,7 @@ earlier can overrule everyone listed later.</cite></p>
> necessary.</li>
>
> <li>The next two weeks are the polling period during which
> Developers may cast their votes. [-Votes in leadership elections are-]
> [- kept secret, even after the election is finished.</li>-]{+</li>+}
>
--
Mathias Behrle
PGP/GnuPG key availabable from any keyserver, ID: 0xD6D09BE48405BBF6
AC29 7E5C 46B9 D0B6 1C71 7681 D6D0 9BE4 8405 BBF6
pgpYUaT5eouJQ.pgp
Description: Digitale Signatur von OpenPGP
