On Tue, Sep 28, 2021 at 08:50:08PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote: > [...] My goal is a proposal that anyone > can support as long as they agree that: > > * We currently need an explicit and clearly-specified decision-making > process for the Technical Committee and the Developers via General > Resolution. > * The current systems for both are confusing and somewhat unclear, and > have loopholes that have caused frustration and perceptions of > unfairness in the past. > * This proposal is an incremental improvement in clarity and fairness > without losing any valuable properties of the existing systems. > > The one trade-off decision that I'm explicitly making is that, given the > past problems and complaints about issues with vote timing, I've made the > timing of votes less flexible in order to make them more predictable.
sounds all very good to me, many thanks for driving this, Russ!
> I would love for us to make more decisions, more quickly, and be more
> willing to change them later based on further experience. I would love
> for us to make more mistakes and learn from them, instead of being
> unwilling to commit or to risk making anyone unhappy and thus postpone
> decisions until they're no longer exciting or motivating and have become
> mere drudgery.
YES!
--
cheers,
Holger
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀
⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ holger@(debian|reproducible-builds|layer-acht).org
⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ OpenPGP: B8BF54137B09D35CF026FE9D 091AB856069AAA1C
⠈⠳⣄
Live may not be the party we hoped for, but while we're here we might as well
dance!
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
