On Fri, Dec 06, 2019 at 09:04:39PM +0100, Guillem Jover wrote: > Hi! > > Ok, so here's what I'd like (or would have liked) to get into the ballot, > given the new context after the addition of the combined D+G option. But > it's not very clear to me whether this will be acceptable or not to the > Secretary, and what would be the actual procedure to replace the existing > option G with this one (as long as enough of the original sponsors are > fine with it), as I've found the way the procedure was applied/interpreted > to be rather confusing or perhaps not matching my memory of previous > instances.
You're really cutting this short, sending an email 4 hours before the vote starts, and we're not at 3 hours before the start. I'm going to need to see at least 5 people seconding this update before 23 UTC, so 2 hours left, to allow this update. Kurt
