Re: Proposal to overturn init systems premature GR

[MJ Ray]

2019-12-05 1:09:00 PM Sam Hartman :
> And as I discussed in the CFV, each successive round of people who
> wonder along and joins the discussion makes the cost higher in real
> ways.

This reads a bit like CFVing early to exclude people which I oppose.

I support Ian. I do not second yet because I think the secretary has ruled it 
out of order.

I am concerned that no allowance seems to be made for secretary overlooking an 
email from Ian.

> This sort of thing is expensive no matter how you handle it. [...]

Yes and I agree with the earlier comment that a repeat soon will be very 
expensive and would prioritise avoiding that.

> I will be shocked if I find that a significant number of people
> rank another option between G+D and D.

If DPLs knew all opinions, we would not need GRs.

-- 

MJR - please excuse brevity because this was sent while mobile