Ian Jackson <ijack...@chiark.greenend.org.uk> writes: > You have got my intent right. How about this as a suggested fix
> patches which contribute support for other init > systems > + (with no substantial effect on systemd installations) > should be filed as bugs with severity `serious' > leaving changes which *do* have such a substantial effect to be dealt > with under 8. > I say "on systemd *installations*" (emph. added) because obviously > building two versions would have a substantial effect on build > infrastructure etc. > Do you think this is clearer and has the right effect ? Yes, that looks great to me. > I am open to other suggestions. If we come to a conclusion on an > improved wording here, I guess someone ought to formally propose it. I > guess it will fall to me to do that. Let me know if it would be helpful for me to propose it. Happy to do so. I was also unclear on who can accept amendments to unaccepted amendments. -- Russ Allbery (r...@debian.org) <https://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>
